From one point of view, it may serve to mitigate public opposition to developments–for example, those seen in Barendrecht in the Netherlands (Bellona, 2010). Public engagement with CCS is important for a range of reasons. It is increasingly recognised that public acceptance of CCS as a vital precondition for its commercial-scale rollout (RCUK, 2010 Wennersten et al., 2015). While CCS may offer environmental and economic benefits (van Egmond and Hekkert, 2012), it remains controversial with high-profile public opposition to particular CCS developments. Along with energy efficiency and certain other mitigation options, it is argued to be a cost-effective measure for reducing CO 2 emissions that cause climate change (Praetorius and Schumacher, 2009). In doing so, CCS is seen as essential for facilitating global carbon abatement efforts (IPCC, 2014 IEA, 2013). Discussing CCS costs should be done in the context of costs of broader energy system transformation and of not mitigating climate change so that the public can deliberate over the relative risks and benefits of CCS and alternatives in the context of broader sustainability pathways.Ĭarbon Capture and Storage (CCS) involves trapping carbon dioxide (CO 2) from power generation and heavy industrial processes and directing it into long-term geological storage (e.g., in depleted oil fields or saline aquifers). Our findings also show mentioning (modest) costs of deploying CCS can lead to lower support. As with other issues, targeting CCS information to audience values is likely to be more effective than untargeted communication. Depending on which CCS lens is chosen, different groups will be more or less likely to support CCS implementation. Pairing CCS with CDU led to higher support for CCS, although information frames interacted with national and individual-level factors. In particular, we compare the lens through which CCS is seen – as a ‘techno-fix’ climate change solution, as reusing a waste product (through Carbon Dioxide Utilisation ), or as part of a systemic approach to climate change mitigation. Here, we present findings from a large-scale international experimental study of public perceptions of CCS, to examine how individual, geographical and informational factors influence support for CCS. While much is known about factors influencing public support for CCS, relatively few cross-national studies have so far been undertaken. For instrumental, normative and substantive reasons, it is increasingly recognised that public acceptance of CCS as a vital precondition for its commercial-scale rollout. Yet, it remains controversial with high-profile public opposition to particular CCS developments. In doing so, CCS could facilitate global carbon abatement efforts. Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) involves trapping carbon dioxide (CO 2) from power generation and heavy industrial processes and directing it into long-term geological storage (e.g., in depleted oil fields or saline aquifers).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |